KONSEP JOINT PHYSICAL CUSTODY PASCA PERCERAIAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF KETENTUAN HADHANAH MENURUT KOMPILASI HUKUM ISLAM: ANALISIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 171/PK/AG/2022

Authors

  • Rahmania Amelia Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Muhammad Amin Nasution Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24260/efnfwx12

Keywords:

Joint Physical Custody, Hadhanah, Kompilasi Hukum Islam, perceraian, hak asuh anak, hukum Islam, Perceraian

Abstract

Divorce does not extinguish parents’ obligations toward their children, particularly with regard to their care, upbringing, education, and fulfillment of their needs. In Islamic law, child custody is known as hadhanah, while the Compilation of Islamic Law (Kompilasi Hukum Islam) regulates hadhanah, particularly under Articles 105 and 156. Developments in post-divorce family law have subsequently introduced the concept of joint physical custody, a parenting arrangement that allows both the father and mother to share responsibility for the physical care of their child according to a predetermined schedule. This concept was recognized in Supreme Court Decision No. 171/PK/Ag/2022, which established that, in the best interests of the child, custody may be implemented through a joint physical custody arrangement.This study aims to analyze the concept of joint physical custody following divorce from the perspective of the hadhanah provisions under the Compilation of Islamic Law, as well as to examine the Supreme Court’s legal considerations in Decision No. 171/PK/Ag/2022. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Legal materials were obtained through a literature review comprising legislation, the Compilation of Islamic Law, court decisions, books, and relevant academic journals. The findings indicate that the application of joint physical custody in Decision No. 171/PK/Ag/2022 reflects the development of child custody law toward placing the best interests of the child as the primary consideration. The concept is consistent with the principles of hadhanah, although shared parenting arrangements have not yet been explicitly regulated in the Compilation of Islamic Law. Accordingly, the Supreme Court’s decision demonstrates an evolving interpretation of the law governing post-divorce child custody.

References

Adly, M. A. (2026). HADHANAH ( CHILD CUSTODY ) IN INDONESIAN SCHOOLS OF THOUGHT AND JURISPRUDENCE. 10(2), 83–96.

Aja Mughnia, G. A. B. (2021). The Concept of Hadhanah from the Perspective of the Mazhab Syafi’i,. Jurnal El-Hadhanah: Indonesia Journal Family and Islamic Law, 1(1), 67.

Al-Qur’an. (n.d.). Al-Qur’an.

Armaijn, L., Darmayanti, D., Sonia, B., & Rochmat, H. (2024). Penerapan Asas Kepastian Hukum Keadilan dan Kemanfaatan Pada Putusan Peninjauan Kembali Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 171/PK/Ag/2022 Tentang Hak Asuh Bersama Perspektif Maqashid Syariah Serta Kontribusi Pengembangannya dalam sistem Hukum Nasional. 2, 306–312.

Azmi, N. N., Farid, D., Husni, M., & Pakarti, A. (2026). Konsep Hadhanah dalam Hukum Islam ; Pendekatan Shared Parenting Setelah Perpisahan nafkah anak setelah perceraian . Berbagai penelitian menunjukkan bahwa putusan pengadilan. Jurnal Ilmiah Dan Karya Mahasiswa, 4(April).

Bastaits, K., & Pasteels, I. (2019). Is joint physical custody in the best interests of the child? Parent–child relationships and custodial arrangements. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(11–12), 3752–3772. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519838071

Gushairi, G. (2025). Indragiri Law Review. Penerapan Asas Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan Dan Kemanfaatan Pada Putusan PK Nomor 171/PK/Ag/2022 Tentang Hak Asuh Bersama Perspektif Undang-Undang Dan Maqasid Syariah, 3(3).

Jafar, M. (2024). Tinjauan Yuridis Hak Asuh Anak (Hadhanah) Setelah Perceraian Menurut Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Rechtsnormen Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Informasi Hukum, 3(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.56211/rechtsnormen.v3i1.625

Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2025). Direktori Putusan. In Https://Putusan3.Mahkamahagung.Go.Id/ (pp. 1–1).

Khuluq, M. K. (2026). Joint Physical Custody dalam Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung. https://marinews.mahkamahagung.go.id/putusan/joint-physical-custody-dalam-yurisprudensi-mahkamah-agung-0bcn

Maghfirah, G. (2020). Maghfirah and Gushairi - 2020 - Konsep Shared Parenting dalam Hadhanah Pasca Perceraian; Kajian Perundang-Undangan Perkawinan Islam. 20(2), 185–202.

Mahkama Agung. (2023). Laporan Tahunan 2023 Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Landmark Decision, 00, 214–259.

Maulana, D. (2023). Telaah Pasal 105 Kompilasi Hukum Islam Tentang Hadhanah. Posita: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.52029/pjhki.v1i01.133

Najid Aufar, M. (2025). Shared Parenting Anak dalam Yurisprudensi MA. https://marinews.mahkamahagung.go.id/putusan/shared-parenting-anak-dalam-yurisprudensi-ma-0AO

Nielsen, L. (2018). Joint versus sole physical custody: Outcomes for children independent of family income or parental conflict. Journal of Child Custody, 15(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2017.1422414

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (1974). Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan.

Qawiyul Iman, R. (2026). Hak Asuh Bersama Demi Kepentingan Terbaik Anak.

Ramadani, H. (2024). JURNAL AR-RISALAH Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam Pascasarjana IAIN Bone. Ar-Risalah, 4(1), 84–98.

Saleh, S., Maryani, Adawiyah, R., & Andriyani, A. (2025). Perlindungan Hak Asuh Anak Pasca Perceraian (Hadhanah): Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Psikologi Anak. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(3), 2829–2838.

Septiani, R. (2021). Kompilasi Hukum Islam Pasal 149 Huruf (b). El-Faqih: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Hukum Islam, 7(2), 44.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-12