ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM PADA PERKARA HARTA BERSAMA AKIBAT PERCERAIAN DITINJAU DARI KOMPILASI HUKUM ISLAM DAN UNDANG-UNDANG PERKAWINAN (PERKARA NOMOR 1726/PDT.G/2020/PA.BKS.)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24260/alusroh.v5i1.4716Kata Kunci:
Harta bersama, Perceraian, Kompilasi Hukum IslamAbstrak
The phenomenon of joint property disputes resulting from divorce occurred in the decision of the Bekasi Religious Court judge in case number 1726/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Bks, in this decision the panel of judges divided joint property outside the provisions stipulated by Article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law, where in the decision The division is 1/3 for the Plaintiff (ex-husband) and 2/3 for the Defendant (ex-wife). So this research aims to find out the legal basis for the judge's council's considerations in deciding cases and find out the relevance of decision number 1726/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Bks to the Compilation of Islamic Law and the Marriage Law. This research uses a qualitative research method, namely a descriptive analysis research method with a normative juridical research approach at the level of a statutory approach and a judge's decision approach. And decision number 1726/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Bks as the primary data source used in this research. The results of this research show that the panel of judges decided on the division of joint assets in the amount of 1/3 for the Plaintiff and 2/3 for the Defendant. The division was carried out by the panel of judges based on considerations and several pieces of evidence which showed that the Defendant (ex-wife) contributed more to the collection of joint assets from the results of his work, while the Plaintiff (ex-husband) admitted that his income was indeed small. The panel of judges did not use article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law in its decision which states that the distribution of joint assets is ½ for each party, the ex-husband and ex-wife. In this case the judge deemed it fair to determine the division of joint assets with 1/3 share for the Plaintiff (ex-husband) and 2/3 share for the Defendant (ex-wife). This judge's decision is in accordance with Satjipto Raharjo's progressive legal theory.
Referensi
Amin Ash Shabah, Musyaffa. “Perkawinan Sebagai HAM.” MASLAHAH (Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perbankan Syariah) 11, no. 2 (22 Maret 2021): 25–33. https://doi.org/10.33558/maslahah.v11i2.2623.
Anwar Sabani, Rizki Fathul. “Analisis Hadis Lā Dharara Walā Dhirāran sebagai Dasar Fatwa Keharaman Rokok.” Digital library UIN Sunan Gunung Jati, t.t. https://etheses.uinsgd.ac.id/45526/13/27102021%2011.06%20Rizki%20Fathul%20Anwar%20Sabani%20REVISI.pdf.
Aprianto, Naerul. “Konsep Harta dalam Tinjauan Maqashid Syari’ah,” 1 Januari 2017. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol3.iss2.art2.
Asnawi, M. Natsir. Hukum Harta Bersama: Kajian Perbandingan Hukum, Telaah Norma, Yurisprudensi, dan Pembaruan Hukum. Prenada Media, 2022.
Aulia, M. Zulfa. “Hukum Progresif Dari Satjipto Rahardjo: Riwayat, Urgensi, Dan Relevansi.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 1 (1 Juni 2018): 159–85. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.1.1.159-185.
Djuniarti. “Hukum Harta Bersama Ditinjau dari Perspektif Undang-Undang Perkawinan dan KUH Perdata,” Desember 2017. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338366365_Hukum_Harta_Bersama_Ditinjau_dari_Perspektif_Undang-Undang_Perkawinan_dan_KUH_Perdata.
Fahrun, Elva, Yoyo Hambali, dan Musyaffa Amin Ash Shabah. “PENDIDIKAN PRANIKAH DALAM MEMBENTUK KELUARGA SAKINAH, MAWADDAH, WARRAHMAH.” Al-Ihsan: Journal of Community Development in Islamic Studies 2, no. 1 (19 Mei 2023): 45–54. https://doi.org/10.33558/alihsan.v2i1.7048.
Faizin, Mu’adil. “Urgensi Fiqh Lingkungan Dalam Perkembangan Fiqh Kontemporer Sebagai Instrumen Pendukung Hukum Lingkungan.” NIZHAM 05, Desember 2016. file:///C:/Users/08082015/Downloads/1065-97-2831-1-10-20180212.pdf.
Haq, Nur Awaliyah. “Analisis Maqashid Al-syariah terhadap Pembagian Harta Bersama Pada Putusan Pengadilan AgamaKendal Nomor 2374/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Kdl.” Universitas ISlam Negri Walisongo, 2020. https://eprints.walisongo.ac.id/id/eprint/12783/1/SKRIPSI_1602016035_NUR%20AWALIYAH%20HAQ.pdf.
Mahkamah Agung. Intruksi Presiden Nomor 1 Tahun 1991 Tentang Kompilasi Hukum Islam, (t.t.). https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/peraturan/detail/11e9da0c8167c5c0b9c2313930343435.html.
———. Putusan Nomor 1726/Pdt.G/PA.Bks (1 November 2020).
Noviani, Lisma. “Arti Yuridullahu Bikumul Yusra Wala Yuridu Bikumul Usro, Ayat Quran & Doa-doa agar Lancar Persalinan.” Diakses 28 Juli 2024. https://sumsel.tribunnews.com/2024/07/06/arti-yuridullahu-bikumul-yusra-wala-yuridu-bikumul-usro-ayat-quran-doa-doa-agar-lancar-persalinan.
Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan (t.t.). https://mahkamahagung.go.id/media/8757.
———. Undang-Undang No 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan (t.t.). http://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/47406/uu-no-1-tahun-1974.
Sari, M. Harwansyah Putra Sinaga, Nellareta Pratiwi, dan Ika Purnama. Buku Saku (Wajib) Persiapan Pernikahan Islami. Elex Media Komputindo, 2021.
Zuhriandi, Novrizal, Fauziah Lubis, dan Nurcahaya. “Contra Legem Pembagian Harta Bersama Perspektif Maslahah Murshalah.” Jayapangus Press Kamaya: Jurnal Ilmu Agama 6 (t.t.). file:///C:/Users/lenovo/Downloads/Novrizal+Zuhriandi.pdf.
##submission.downloads##
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Siti Alivia, Suprihatin, Musyaffa Amin Ash Shabah, Agus Supriyanto
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
.png)
_.png){kind=logo}
.jpg)
.png)
.png)
