HYBRID COASTAL DA’WAH MODEL: INTEGRATING DIGITAL MEDIA AND LOCAL WISDOM TO PROMOTE RELIGIOUS MODERATION AMONG COASTAL MUSLIM COMMUNITIES

Authors

  • Siti Kris Fitriana Wahyu Lestari Institut Agama Islam Nahdlatul Ulama Tuban, Indonesia
  • Auliya Urokhim Institut Agama Islam Nahdlatul Ulama Tuban, Indonesia
  • Fajar Iriandi Institut Agama Islam Nahdlatul Ulama Tuban, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24260/50g42s77

Keywords:

Hybrid coastal da'wah, digital media, local wisdom, religious moderation, coastal Muslim communities.

Abstract

Purpose – This study examines how the integration of digital media and local wisdom shapes hybrid da’wah practices that promote religious moderation among coastal Muslim communities in Bancar, Tuban, Indonesia. Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative case study was conducted between March and May 2026. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 18 informants selected through purposive and snowball sampling (religious leaders, mosque administrators, digital da’wah managers, youth, women’s religious-group representatives, fishermen and coastal residents, and village stakeholders), participant observation, and the analysis of digital documents. The data were analysed through reflexive thematic analysis supported by NVivo. Findings – Hybrid coastal da’wah emerges from the interaction of four components: local religious authority, digital media circulation, coastal local wisdom, and the values of religious moderation. WhatsApp, Facebook, YouTube, and short-form videos widen the reach of religious messages, whereas mosque administrators and religious leaders act as trusted gatekeepers who validate and filter content. Local wisdom, expressed in rukun, gotong royong, tepo seliro, and respect for elders, provides the cultural infrastructure through which moderation is communicated calmly and accepted socially. Uneven digital literacy and externally produced content with a harsher tone remain the main constraints. Research limitations/implications – The single-case design precludes statistical generalisation; the study instead offers an analytically transferable model for digital religion and community-based da’wah scholarship. Practical implications – Religious institutions can strengthen mosque-based gatekeeping, involve youth as digital intermediaries, and embed digital literacy and village-level deliberation in outreach strategies. Originality/value – The study proposes the Hybrid Coastal Da’wah Model, showing that moderation is fostered through the synergy of trusted authority, responsible digital communication, and culturally rooted Islamic practice rather than by digital transformation alone.

References

Abdurrahman, F., Andrian, B., Gunawan, M. K., Hariyanto, & Riduan. (2026). Digital da’wah communication and destination image construction in religious tourism: A digital ethnography of Lemukutan Island. J-MD Jurnal Manajemen Dakwah, 7(1), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.24260/c20hnf72

Aidulsyah, F. (2023). The rise of urban Salafism in Indonesia: The social-media and pop culture of new Indonesian Islamic youth. Asian Journal of Social Science, 51(4), 252–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajss.2023.07.003

Akmaliah, W. (2020). The demise of moderate Islam: New media, contestation, and reclaiming religious authorities. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 10(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v10i1.1-24

Al-Manduri, R., Wulan Sari, D., Cahaya Amanda, N., & Hafizul Arifin, M. (2025). Ethics and religious authority in the age of artificial intelligence: A study on the da’wah narratives of NU Online. J-MD Jurnal Manajemen Dakwah, 6(2), 28–46. https://e-journal.iainptk.ac.id/index.php/j-md/article/view/5279

Amin, A. (2025). The role of religious moderation in strengthening the link between local wisdom and sustainable development goals. Abrahamic Religions Journal, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.22373/arj.v5i1.28978

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597

Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y

Campbell, H. A., & Evolvi, G. (2020). Contextualizing current digital religion research on emerging technologies. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.149

Campbell, H. A. (2017). Surveying theoretical approaches within digital religion studies. New Media & Society, 19(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816649912

Campbell, H. A., & Tsuria, R. (Eds.). (2022). Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in digital media (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Eviyanti, Y., Handayani, R., & Romandiah. (2025). Social media is a means of da’wah in the digital era. J-MD Jurnal Manajemen Dakwah, 5(2), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.24260/j-md.v5i3.3735

Evolvi, G. (2022). Religion and the internet: Digital religion, (hyper)mediated spaces, and materiality. Zeitschrift für Religion, Gesellschaft und Politik, 6, 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41682-021-00087-9

Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020). A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLOS ONE, 15(5), e0232076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076

Hennink, M. M., Kaiser, B. N., & Marconi, V. C. (2017). Code saturation versus meaning saturation: How many interviews are enough? Qualitative Health Research, 27(4), 591–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316665344

Hennink, M. M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523

Heriansyah, H., & Achmad, M. Z. (2025). Da’wah hybrid: Management and response of surau congregation to the blended da’wah program. J-MD Jurnal Manajemen Dakwah, 5(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.24260/j-md.v5i1.3372

Hjarvard, S. (2016). Mediatization and the changing authority of religion. Media, Culture & Society, 38(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715615412

Jackson, K., & Bazeley, P. (2019). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Kholili, M., Izudin, A., & Hakim, M. L. (2024). Islamic proselytizing in digital religion in Indonesia: The challenges of broadcasting regulation. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2357460

Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030

Lim, M. (2017). Freedom to hate: Social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2017.1341188

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Lindgren, B.-M., Lundman, B., & Graneheim, U. H. (2020). Abstraction and interpretation during the qualitative content analysis process. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 108, 103632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103632

Menchik, J. (2019). Moderate Muslims and democratic breakdown in Indonesia. Asian Studies Review, 43(3), 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2019.1627286

Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia. (2019). Moderasi beragama. Badan Litbang dan Diklat Kementerian Agama RI.

Natow, R. S. (2020). The use of triangulation in qualitative studies employing elite interviews. Qualitative Research, 20(2), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119830077

Nisa, E. F. (2018). Social media and the birth of an Islamic social movement: ODOJ (One Day One Juz) in contemporary Indonesia. Indonesia and the Malay World, 46(134), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2017.1416758

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Pajarianto, H., Pribadi, I., & Sari, P. (2022). Tolerance between religions through the role of local wisdom and religious moderation. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 78(4). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v78i4.7043

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Rusmalita, S., Ibrahim, I., Sulthon, M., & Panaemalae, A. R. A. (2026). Dakwah strategies of Islamic women’s organizations in Indonesia–Malaysia border communities: A resource mobilization perspective. J-MD Jurnal Manajemen Dakwah, 7(1), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.24260/1zbge084

Smith, B. (2018). Generalizability in qualitative research: Misunderstandings, opportunities and recommendations for the sport and exercise sciences. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 10(1), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2017.1393221

Solahudin, D., & Fakhruroji, M. (2020). Internet and Islamic learning practices in Indonesia: Social media, religious populism, and religious authority. Religions, 11(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11010019

Tsuria, R., Yadlin-Segal, A., Vitullo, A., & Campbell, H. A. (2017). Approaches to digital methods in studies of digital religion. The Communication Review, 20(2), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2017.1304137

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Zaid, B., Fedtke, J., Shin, D. D., El Kadoussi, A., & Ibahrine, M. (2022). Digital Islam and Muslim millennials: How social media influencers reimagine religious authority and Islamic practices. Religions, 13(4), 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13040335

Downloads

Published

2026-10-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

HYBRID COASTAL DA’WAH MODEL: INTEGRATING DIGITAL MEDIA AND LOCAL WISDOM TO PROMOTE RELIGIOUS MODERATION AMONG COASTAL MUSLIM COMMUNITIES. (2026). J-MD Jurnal Manajemen Dakwah, 7(2), 38-62. https://doi.org/10.24260/50g42s77

Similar Articles

1-10 of 102

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.