Interrelation of Reason and Revelation: Analysis of the Thought of Ulama Mutakallimin in the Formation of Islamic Law
Interelasi Akal dan Wahyu: Analisis Pemikiran Ulama Mutakallimin dalam Pembentukan Hukum Islam
Abstract
This paper aims to reveal and analyze the thoughts of Mutakallimin scholars on the interpretation of reason and revelation in the formation of Islamic law, which has been a debate. The debate was caused by several factors, including the understanding of the Quran and Sunnah texts, dwellings, social, and culture. In this article, the author finds that Mutakallimin scholars agree that the answer to Islamic law problems cannot be separated from the first source, namely the Quran and the Sunnah. If the Alquran and Sunnah are not found, then Mutakalimin scholars agree to use ijtihad and qiyas. Ijtihad and qiyas are the results of the mujtahid’s reasoning towards Allah SWT's revelations, whose meaning is still unclear, global, and general to reveal the purpose and purpose Allah's revelation regarding the problems of everyday human life. Thus, the Mutakalimin scholars position human reason in the formation of Islamic law as a mediation of the argument of ‘aqliyah to answer everyday human problems in worship, zakat, muamalah, economics, and politics. Besides, Mutakallimin scholars have different Islamic legal, methodological concepts, but the primary sources in forming mutually agreed upon Islamic law are the Alquran, Sunnah, ijma’, and qiyas. Ijma’ and qiyas here have an essential role in the mind's intellect towards revelation so that they can become a bridge in the formation of laws to answer human problems along with the place and era.
References
“164777-ID-akal-dan-wahyu-antara-perdebatan-dan-pem.pdf,” diakses 10 Desember 2020. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/164777-ID-akal-dan-wahyu-antara-perdebatan-dan-pem.pdf.
A. Qodri Azizy. Reformasi Bermazhab, Sebuah Ikhtiar Menuju Ijtihad Saintifik-Modern. 1 ed. Jakarta, 2003.
Abdul Aziz Dahlan [et al]. Ensiklopedi Hukum Islam. Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve, 1996.
Abdul Wahab Khallaf. Ilmu Usul Fiqh. 2 ed. al-Haramain: Darul Qolam, 2004.
Abdullah, M. Amin. Mazhab Jogja [Buku 1]. Yogyakarta: Ar-ruzz Press: Fakultas Tarbiyah, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Sunan Kalijaga, 2002.
Ali, Mohammad Daud. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 1991.
Dhestiana, Nur Ida. “Kedudukan Akal dan Wahyu Perspektif M. Abduh dan Harun Nasution.” Attanwir: Jurnal Keislaman dan Pendidikan 10, no. 1 (2019): 13–29.
Farid, Farid, dan Mustofa Anshori Lidinillah. “Otoritas Wahyu dan Kreativitas Akal dalam Penetapan Hukum Islam (Tinjauan Epistemologis terhadap Hukum Islam).” Jurnal Filsafat 1, no. 1 (1997): 66–74.
Fikri, Ahmad Lutfi, dan Mufid Arsyad. “Zakat Tanaman: Konsep, Potensi dan Strategi Peningkatannya di Indonesia.” Jurnal Mahkamah: Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam 5, no. 1 (14 Juni 2020): 57–74. https://doi.org/10.25217/jm.v5i1.718.
Hakim, Muhammad Lutfi. “Hermeneutik-Negosiasi dalam Studi Fatwa-Fatwa Keagamaan: Analisis Kritik terhadap Pemikiran Khaled M. Abou El Fadl.” Istinbath 19, no. 1 (16 Juli 2020): 27–52. https://doi.org/10.20414/ijhi.v19i1.204.
Hakim, Muhammad Lutfi. “Rekonstruksi Hak Ijbar Wali (Aplikasi Teori Perubahan Hukum dan Sosial Ibn al-Qayyim Al-Jawziyyah).” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 8, no. 1 (2014): 45–56. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v8i1.401.
Hamid Laonso, Muhammad Jamil. Hukum Islam Alternatif, Solusi terhadap Masalah Fiqh Kontemporer. Jakarta: Restu Ilahi, 2005.
Hatoli, Hatoli. “Sertifikasi Halal Majelis Ulama Indonesia pada Produk Elektronik dan Non Konsumsi Perspektif Maslahah.” JIL: Journal of Islamic Law 1, no. 2 (15 Agustus 2020): 237–55. https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v1i2.45.
Ibnu Qayyim al-Jauziyah. I’lam al-Muwaqi’in ’an Rabbi al-Alamin. Bairut: Darul Kutub Ilmiyah, t.t.
Imam Muhammad Abu Zahrah. Ushul Fiqh. 2 ed. Dar al-Fikr al-Arabiy, 2003.
Imran, Maizul, Beni Firdaus, dan Arsal Arsal. “Adopted Children as Mahram: Responding to Ijtihad ‘Ā’Isyah (614-679 Ad) in the Flow of Modernization.” Jurnal Mahkamah: Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam 5, no. 2 (27 Desember 2020): 165–80. https://doi.org/10.25217/jm.v5i2.1004.
Khalik, Subehan. “Menguak Eksistensi Akal dan Wahyu dalam Hukum Islam.” Al Daulah : Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Ketatanegaraan 6 (25 Desember 2017): 358–70. https://doi.org/10.24252/ad.v6i2.4889.
Munawwir, Ahmad Warson, dan Zainal Abidin Munawwir. Al-Munawwir, Kamus Arab-Indonesia. Unit Pengadaan Buku-Buku Ilmiah Keagamaan, Pondok Pesantren" Al-Munawwir", 1984.
Musa Ibrahim Al-Ibrahimy. Madhkol Usul Fiqih Watarihu al-Tasyri al-Islamiyah, t.t.
Sarjana, Sunan Autad, dan Imam Kamaluddin Suratman. “Konsep ‘Urf dalam Penetapan Hukum Islam.” TSAQAFAH 13, no. 2 (2017): 279–96.
Sarjana, Sunan, dan Imam Suratman. “Pengaruh Realitas Sosial terhadap Perubahan Hukum Islam: Telaah atas Konsep ‘Urf.” TSAQAFAH 13 (25 Januari 2018): 279. https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v13i2.1509.
Sulaiman Bin Shaleh Bin Abdul Aziz Al-Ghasni. Mauqif al Mutakallimin Juz 2: Min al Istidlal bi Nushush al Kitab wa al Sunnah. 1 ed. Riyad: Dar Al Aminah, 1996.
Tajuddin Abdul Wahab Bin Ali Al-Subki. Jam’u al-Jawami. 2 ed. Lebanon: Darul Kutub Al-’Alamiyah, 2003.
Wabah Al-Zuhaili. al-Fiqhu al-Islâmy wa Adillatuhu. Bairut: Dâr al-Fikr, t.t.
———. Usul Al-Fiq Al-Islami. 4 ed. Damasqi: Dar Al-Fikr, t.t.
Wathani, Syamsul. “Tradisi Berpikir dalam Usul Fikih (Memetakan Porsi, Posisi dan Proporsi Akal Sebagai Nalar Berpikir dalam Hukum Islam).” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 9, no. 2 (2015): 207–22.
Yaqin, Ainol. “Urgensi Tarjîh dalam Istinbath Hukum Islam.” Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial 10, no. 1 (2015): 108–27.
Yasid, Abu. Islam Akomodatif: Rekonstruksi Pemahaman Islam sebagai Agama Universal. Cet. 1. Yogyakarta: LKiS, 2004.
Yusuf Al-Qordowi. Fatwa Fatwa Kontemporer. Pustaka Al Kautsa, t.t.
———. Figih Zakat. Jakarta, Raja Grafindo Persada: Litera Antar Nusa, t.t.
Copyright (c) 2021 Kawakib Kawakib, Hafidz Syuhud
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
