The Paradigm of Knowledge Integration: The Concept of Fiqh Al-Syāmil Fī Al-Dīn Wa Al-Ḥayāh in The Development of Integral and Holistic Knowledge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24260/d7n91406Keywords:
Integration of Knowledge, Fiqh al-Syâmil, Islamic epistemology, Integral and Holistic ScienceAbstract
The paradigm of Fiqh al-Syâmil fî ad-Dîn wa al-Hayâh represents an epistemological framework that emphasizes the unity of religion and life, revelation and reason, as well as spiritual values and scientific rationality. Within this perspective, knowledge is not value-free but serves as a divine instrument for achieving human and civilizational well-being. This study aims to explore the philosophical meaning of Fiqh al-Syâmil and its implications for the integration of knowledge in Islam, by tracing the thoughts of both classical and contemporary Muslim scholars. Employing a qualitative library research design through Islamic epistemology and philosophy of science approaches, the study analyzes key works by Ismail Raji al-Faruqi, Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas, Fazlur Rahman, Kuntowijoyo, Mulyadhi Kartanegara, Amin Abdullah, Harun Nasution, Nanat Fatah Nasir, and Azyumardi Azra. The findings reveal that Fiqh al-Syâmil is grounded in the principle of tawhid as the core of Islamic epistemology, integrating three modes of knowing: bayani (textual-revelatory), burhani (rational-empirical), and ‘irfani (spiritual-intuitive). The synthesis of these dimensions results in an integral, ethical, and civilizational model of knowledge capable of bridging the gap between religious and secular sciences. Conceptually, this paradigm aligns with al-Faruqi’s Islamization of Knowledge, al-Attas’s adab-based epistemology, Kuntowijoyo’s prophetic social science, and Amin Abdullah’s interconnected integration. Within Islamic higher education, Fiqh al-Syâmil serves as a foundational framework for developing integrative curricula, interdisciplinary research, and epistemological reconstruction oriented toward human welfare and moral civilization.
References
Abdullah, M. Amin. (2006). Islamic Studies di Perguruan Tinggi: Pendekatan Integratif-Interkonektif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Abdullah, M. Amin. (2006). Pendekatan Integratif-Interkonektif dalam Studi Islam. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Abdullah, M. Amin. (2012). Islamic Studies and Interdisciplinary Approaches. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Açıkgenç, Alparslan. Islamic Science: Towards a Definition. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC.
Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1993). Islam and Secularism. Kuala Lumpur: International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC).
Al-Fārābī. Arā’ Ahl al-Madīnah al-Fāḍilah. Cairo: Dār al-Ma‘ārif, n.d.
Al-Faruqi, I. R. (1982). Islamization of Knowledge: General Principles and Work Plan. Herndon, VA: International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT).
Denzin, Norman K. & Yvonna S. Lincoln. (2018). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Harahap, Syahrin. (2011). Wawasan Integrasi Ilmu. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Kartanegara, M. (2003). Pengantar Epistemologi Islam. Bandung: Mizan.
Kartanegara, M. (2005). Integrasi Ilmu: Sebuah Rekonstruksi Holistik. Bandung: Mizan.
Krippendorff, Klaus. (2013). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuntowijoyo. (2006). Islam sebagai Ilmu: Epistemologi, Metodologi, dan Etika. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
Manẓūr, Ibn. (t.t.). Lisān al-‘Arab. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir.
Nasution, H. (1995). Islam rasional: Gagasan dan pemikiran. Bandung: Mizan.
Nasr, S. H. (1987). Science and Civilization in Islam. Cambridge: Islamic Texts Society.
Nasr, S. H. (1989). Knowledge and the Sacred. Albany: Suny Press.
Nasir, N. F. (2008). “Wahyu Memandu Ilmu: Kerangka Pengembangan Keilmuan UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung,” dokumen akademik UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.
Nicolescu, Basarab. (2002). Manifesto of Transdisciplinarity. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Ridley, Diana. (2012). The Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide for Students (London: Sage Publications.
Taylor, Charles. (2007). A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sina, Ibn. (t.t.). Al-Shifâ’: Al-Ilâhiyyât. Cairo: Al-Hay’ah al-Mishriyyah
Sugiyono. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Zed, Mestika. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rusman Nurdiansyah, Supiana, Sofwan Gozali, Raka Akhmad Himan Nurwahyu, Nurjaman Wahyu Ramdani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
